INTRODUCTION
For the press to play their basic roles, it must exercise fully its freedom. In other words, for the freedom of the press to be fully appreciated, we must understand the implication of t citizen having a fundamental right to free access to facts in all matters that directly or indirectly concern him and also the right to express and publish its opinion thereon.
In describing the operation of the press in their book entitled four theories of the press, Siebert, Peterson and Schramn (1985) said that “The Press is not an instrument of government but a device for presenting evidence and argument on the basis of which the people can check on government and make up their minds as to its policy. It is imperative that the press be free from control and influence so that truth can emerge.
On this premise, the General Assembly of the United Nations on December 14, 1946 declared, “freedom of information is a fundamental human right and is the corner stone of all freedom to which the United Nations is consecrated.
th
1999 when it handed over the mantle of leadership to a democratically elected government led by Chief Olusegun Obasanjo.The media as the fourth arm of government was not spared from the military obnoxious policies. Their control, which was determined by decrees led to outright closure of media house, death of some media practitioners, intimidation and harassment etc.
The imprisonment of journalists over reports government felt was antagonistic saw the likes of Tunde Thompson and Nduka Irabor jailed under the infamous decrees 4 in 1987. Others include Chris Okolie, Innocent Okparadike, Editor of the Observe in Benin etc. All these happening under the military regime did not make it conducive for the press to function optimally. The military may not be entirely written off as enemies of the media because they ushered in an era that led to competition among various media organizations. This is because the excessive dictatorial tendencies of the military caused the press to become more daring and committed to seeking its freedom.
The high handedness of the military reduced some media houses into government mega-phone for fear of being harassed or closed down. Such media who owe their existence, control and sustenance to the government of the day depended on it for subvention as a means of survival. Mostly affected were the electronic media and some print media owned and controlled by those in power. This led to the deregulation in 1989 of media houses by issuing operating licenses especially to those who want to own and operate the electronic media. This development led to the establishment of private radio and television houses in the country thus breaking government monopoly of the electronic media industry.
Coming up on the heels of these deregulations were stations like the African Independence Television (AIT), MINAJ, DBN etc. Inspite of these welcome developments, the torture on the media houses that were closed down and opened some months before the exit of the military in the governance of the country cannot be quantified.
The military quit leadership of the country in May 1999 and handed over to a democratically elected government led by Chief Olusegun Obasanjo, which has long been the agitation of the press and the entire country. Under this administration, the press may be said to have an air of freedom in the exercise of its constitutional role as the eye and ear of the society. Innovations in the operations of the media may have resulted due to advance in technology; enough have not been achieved if any in terms of ownership of the media in the last five years of the current administration.
Although the administration has done its best in initiating policies that can lead to the protection of infant industries and manufacturers, especially the local manufacturers. It has not done much in the area of information technology or high way that is the order of the day in making the world a global village.
There are still feelings that the news content of the media are being doctored to fit or rather suit the aspiration of those in power. There is also a feeling that the sectional political nature of the society may have polarized the media in such a that each pursues an agenda favourable to its ethnic origin or its ethnic consideration.
The other school of thought has it that the media has lost its bite and is no longer that which fought for the enthronement of democracy in the country thus, allowing a lot of malpractices to have their way into the nation’s polity. While most people attribute this to their resolve in supporting the democratic dispensation, others felt that the media for fear of being intimidated, have succumbed to the feelings and aspirations of the government.
These issues therefore make this study very important as we will in the following chapters discuss the operations of the media in the current administration of President Olusegun Obasanjo; the attempt will hinge on providing solutions to some of the startling issues posed in this background.
The study under review has the operations of the press at its epi-centre in the current democratic dispensation of Olusegun Obasanjo. We are going to look at some of the policies that have undermined the social responsibility of the press, as well as policies that have favoured the activities of the press in the aforementioned administration.
Is the word “Press Freedom” in existence in the true reality of life and, if so, how does it function? Or are they determined by the kind of government in operation from society to society or country to country?
The result achieved here will enable us to say in concrete terms whether the press should be left free or should not be left free in discharging their statutory functions.
This study is significant in view of the negative feelings the present administration has received from its citizens and, the belief of what the press have played in the hands of government. But it no longer carries her activities in line with the constitution that sets them up. Also is the fact that the present administration tends to intimidate the press on their activities, thus lending credence to the allegation that the press have been bough over.
This will aim at assessing the performance of the press, the atmosphere in which they operate, given this dispensation, which is Olusegun Obasanjo regime period. They are as follows:
H1: Civilian rule fosters brighter prospect for the media.
H0: Civilian rule does not foster brighter prospect for the
media.
H2: The media have performed well in this dispensation
than in any other civilian rule.
H0: The media have not performed well in this
dispensation than in any other civilian rule.
H3: The press has been used as an instrument of
government under civilian rule.
H0: The press has not been used as an instrument of
government under civilian rule.
H4: The media are presently being controlled by the
Obasanjo administration.
H0: The media are not presently being controlled by the
Obasanjo administration.
According to Tunji oseni (1999) said that whilst disagreeing on the freedom of the forth estate as constitutional obligation of the media to monitor the government and hold mot accountable to the governed posited that we must use our professional acumen to save Nigeria from warrantors and the media should not lower its grid in the coming political administration.
In the united studies of award, the first amendments guaranteed press freedom in essence, press freedom guarantee in practice has been restricted in one way or the other. The soccopolicod ideology of a notion continues to be reflective of the types of press system that operates in that society. Conversely, a nation that operates the democratic system of government, the press should ideally be involving in the direction of freedom, not Condit, liberty, open market of ideals etc. on the other hand, a nation that operates on authorities system of government : its press system is bound to be under source from of rigs control, irrationality and censorship.
As we may believe the western culture allows the concept of free press, which nationally offers every one in the society the right to start and operate a media outfit fund for such undertaking.
This research was intended to cover an appraisal of free freedom in Nigeria under civilian rule with the Olusegun Obasanjo 1999 – 2004, as case study.
Based on the topic of this study, I limited the study on assessing the performance of Obasanjo on the media in the last five years. Because of the nature of the study, relevant material and literature that would compliment the attempt are not available. It has nonetheless propelled me into action to ensure that I meet with the requirements of this exercise.
Adequate sampling size is likely to pose a threat to this research. This is because not all the respondents may have exposure to problems, which the press has encountered presently. Again, the multicultured nature of our society is such that the press could be said to be concentrated on few hands, thus giving a clear assessment of the incumbent vis-à-vis his relationship with the media becomes a bit difficult.
Financial constrain made me streamline, the research endeavour to meek the available resources. the time frame in view of the crowded academic activities equally limited my research effort. These as highlighted above are the handicaps, which I envisaged limited the sphere of this study.
CONCEPTUAL AND OPERATIONAL
Conceptual: This is the assessment of an expert opinion on the value of an issue such as press freedom.
Operational: To determine the view and evaluation of experts on the value of freedom of press.
Press Freedom:
Conceptual: This is the fundamental right of every person to have free access to the fact in all matters that directly or indirectly concern him and, his equal right to express and publish his opinion and to hear and read the opinion of others.
Operational: To know if the press with these rights are free to gather news without obstruction, to publish the comment on it thereon.
Civilian Rule:
Conceptual: This refers to the exercise of power or authority over a given society or country which does not have its roots or foundation from armed forces.
Operational: To determine the effect of power under a society that is free from armed forces in its foundation.
Government:
Conceptual: This refers to the exercise of political authority over the actions, affairs etc. of a political unit or people as well as the performance of certain functions for this unit or body.
Operational: This is known as the body that have authority to rule a political unit of people including the press and how they go about it.