Home Project-material BOKOHARAM INSURGECY AND NATIONAL SECURITY (2002–2017)

BOKOHARAM INSURGECY AND NATIONAL SECURITY (2002–2017)

Dept: HISTROY AND INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS File: Word(doc) Chapters: 1-5 Views: 1

Abstract

Abstract ThisstudyexaminedBokoHaram insurgencyandnationalsecurity,2002- 2017.Thestudywasnecessitatedonthepremisethatterrorism has affectedlivesallovertheworldandhasresultedinnegatingworldpeaceat analarmingrate.Theobjectivesofthestudyweretoexaminewhetherthe incidenceofterrorism hasimpactedonnationalsecurity;andtoascertain theeffectsofterrorism onNigeriansforeignpolicy.Secondarydatawas used and the Marxian politicaleconomy theory formed a basis of theoreticalanalysis.Theexposefactoresearchdesignwasadoptedand datawasanalyzedusingthequantitativedescriptivemethod.Thefindings oftheresearchprovedthatnonationcanguaranteeabsolutesecuritytoits citizenswithoutcollaborationwiththelargerinternationalcommunity; terrorism isanactofviolenceandviolenceisacontinuationofpoliticsby othermeans.Thestudyrecommendsacontinuouscapacitybuildingfor intelligenceandsecurityoperativesandagencies;andtheinitiationof counterterroristmeasurestopreventattacksfromterrorists.
INTRODUCTION

1.1 BackgroundtotheStudy

The21stcenturyhaswitnessedunforeseeneventswhichhavealtered

thecourseofhistory.Besidesthetechnologicaladvancements,thebiggest

changeundoubtedlyhasbeentheemergenceofterrorism asoneofthe

biggestglobalthreats.Terrorism hasbeeninsidiouslyaffectinglivesall

overtheworldandhasresultedinspoilingtheworldpeaceatanalarming

rate.MayitbeasuperpowerlikeUnitedStatesofAmericaoradeveloping

countrylikeIndia,terrorism continuestospreaditsrootswithnoconcrete

solution.Ithasnotonlydebilitatednationalsecuritybuthasalsoled

countriesintoasituationofanarchy.

Terrorism isamethod,whichcanbeusedbyanypersonorgroupand

foranykindofmotive.Asaform ofviolence,terrorism tellsuslittleabout

thepeoplewhoemployit,nordoesthetacticitselfexplainwhyitisbeing

used.Beforeembarkingonamoredetailedanalysisandprojectionof

11

trends,itistherefore worth remembering thatlumping togetherand

prescribingstandardizedsolutionsforvastlydifferentviolentconflicts

basedmerelyontacticalsimilarity,thatis,theuseof‘terroristic’means

doesnotleadtovalidpredictions.AsBrianJenkinsputit,terrorism is

merelythe‘thincrustatopaverydeeppie’Jenkins(2005),anditcannot

thereforebeunderstoodwithoutreferencetothespecificpoliticaland

societalconditionsinwhichitoccurs.Anyattempttoderivewide-ranging

insightsaboutthecausesandpossiblesolutionsforparticularviolent

conflictsbasedsolelyontheir‘terroristic’manifestationsmustfail.

Terrorism andglobalsecurityhavebecomesignificantcontentionin

shapingforeignpolicyofnationsacrosstheglobe.Recentliteratureshave

revealedthatsuchissuesas,social,economic,politicalandtechnological

factorsthatrevolvearoundthehubofglobalsecuritymattershavebeen

seriouslyunderminedbycancerousactsofterrorism.Thisisbecause

terrorisminwhicheverform,posesanalarmingkindofviolenceandthreat

inthecontemporaryworld,whichconstitutesgreathindrancetofreeflow

relationshipthatexistamongstnations.InNigeriaforinstance,thecause

ofterrorism rangesfrom religiousextremism,perceivedoppressionand

nationalistseparatistorethnicconsiderationsthatnodoubthavegreatly

impactedontheNigerianforeignpolicy.

12

Apartfrom the challenges ofpoverty,sectarian,economic and

politicalcrises,andNigerDeltaMilitancy,Nigeriaiscurrentlyfacinga

deeperandprofoundchallengeofterrorism,especiallyintheNorth-Eastern

regionofthecountry.Inthepasttwoyears,wehavewitnessedthe

vulnerabilityoftheNigerianstatetoterror,criminalityandinstability.The

listofthesedishearteningphenomenaincludesbutisnotlimitedtothe

bombing ofseveralChurches,Mosques,PoliceStations,Schoolsand

PrisonsinBauchi,Bornu,YobeandAdamawastates.Otherpartsofthe

countrywerenotspared,asthesect-bombingactivitieswerewitnessedin

theFederalcapitalterritory,Abuja,Plateau,KadunaandKanostates.The

bombing ofthe United Nationsoffice in Abuja isperhapswhatthe

insurgentsusedtogainglobalrecognition;astheyarenowlistedamongst

terroristorganizationsbytheUnitedStatesanditsallies,(formoredetails

seeTheEconomist,September3,2011).

Availablestatisticsonthenumberofdeathsandpropertylostto

BokoHaram insurgencybetween2002and2013tosaytheleastishighly

controversial.AccordingtotheEconomist,September3,2011over10,000

people(includingwomenandchildren)havebeenkilledandpropertyworth

over100milliondollarshavebeendestroyedduringtheperiodunder

discussion(culledfrom interview ofvictimsofBokoHaram attacksin

13

Abuja,NorthCentral,NorthEastandNorthWestregionsofthecountry).

However,officialreportsputthedeathtollat8,000plusandproperty

destroyedat40milliondollars(culledfrom theinterview ofgovernment

officialsinAbuja,Yobe,Kaduna,PlateauandAdamawastates).

Government’sresponsetotheviciousattacksofBokoHaram has

beenadiversemixofhopeandtrepidation.Hopeliesinthefactthata

stateofemergencyhasbeendeclaredin(AdamawaState,BornoStateand

YobeStates)inhabitedbytheinsurgentgroup.Apartfrom thateachtime

thePoliceandothersecurityorganizationsresponsibleforinternalsecurity

seem tobeoverwhelmedbytheinsurgents,thearmyisusuallybroughtin

to force them to retreat.Trepidation arises from the abilityofthe

insurgentstoregroupandstrikeevenwiththeimposedstateofemergency.

Thecountry’svulnerabilitytoincessantattacksfrom armedinsurgents

posesagreatsecuritychallenge.AccordingtotheMinisterofinformation,

LabaranMaku,thecountryspends27%ofitsbudgetoninternalsecurity

alone.Theseareresourcesthatcouldhavebeenusedtorehabilitatethe

country’sdeplorableinfrastructure(Reviewof2013byChannelsTelevision).

FollowingthedeclarationofstateofemergencyinAdamawa,Borno

andYobestates,governmenttroopshavelaunchedsustainedoffensive

againsttheinsurgentgroup,butthishasnotyieldedthedesiredresults.

14

Mostrecently,theAirforcebaseandArmypostinMaiduguriwereattacked

byBokoHaraminsurgents.Accordingtoanofficialreport,“twohelicopters

andthreeout-ofserviceplanesweredestroyed”.“Twomilitarypersonnel

wereinjuredand24militantskilled”.However,witnessesaccountculled

from socialmediaclaimedthatover100persons,includingcivilianswere

killed.

Inresponsetotheattack,theGovernmentimposeda24-hourcurfewin

thetownofYobestates.Thattheinsurgentgroupisabletolaunchattacks

onmilitaryinstallationsandotherpublicinstitutionsevenwhenthestateof

emergencyisstillinplace,raisesquestionsabouttheeffectivenessofthe

government’scounter-offensivepolicy.Thisiswhathasinstigatedthis

investigation.Itisinthelightoftheabove,thatthisstudyattemptsto

investigateterrorism anditsimpactonthe21stcenturyacasestudyof

BokoHaraminsurgencyinNigeria.

1.2StatementofProblem

Terrorism,arguably,isthebiggestthreattoglobalpeaceandstability

in the contemporarytimes.Since the dawn ofthis millennium,the

incidenceoftheterrorism hasbeenonasteadyriseworldwide.Hitherto,

terrorism wasmoreorlessanationalorregionalaffair.Ithasbeen

observedthatpartofthedifficultyinconstructingauniversallyaccepted

15

definitionofterrorism isaconsequenceoftheexistenceoforganizations

andleadersthatwereformallybrandedasterroristbuteventuallyevolved

into acceptableleadersofgovernments.Thisisthecasewithsome

liberationmovementsthatfoughtcolonialism orisstillfightingoppressive

regimeswithintheirowncountriesasalastresort.Anexampleofthisis

JomoKenyatta’sMauMauandNelsonMandela’sAfricaNationalCongress.

Interestingly,Mandela(Africa’sForemostNationalistLeader)wroteinhis

autobiographythat“50yearsofnon-violencebroughthispeoplenothing,

butmorerepressivelegislationandfewerrights”Mandela(1994).

The United States DepartmentofDefense defined terrorism as the

calculated useofunlawfulviolenceorthreatofunlawfulviolenceto

inculcatefearintendedtocoerceortointimidateeithercitizens,societies,

oreventhegovernmentinthepursuitofgoalsthataregenerallypolitical,

religiousorideological.

Bethatasitmay,whatwediscoveredfrom theabovedefinitionand

interpretationofterrorism arethreekeyelementsthatappearinmost

definitions.Theyare(1)aviolencemeans,(2)aimedattriggeringpolitical

change,(3)byaffectingalargeraudiencethanitsimmediatetarget.

Internationalterrorism,whichisterrorism thattranscendsnational

borders,isthereforebothanactionandreactiontorepression,desperation

16

and hopelesssituations.Theactionsand reactionstakeon political,

economic,social,ideological,psychological,emotionalandreligiousfervor

(Mukwaya2004).Terrorism isthereforeapolitically,economicallyand

religiously motivated violence directed againstnon-combatants and

designedtoinstillfearinatargetaudience.Itisanactthatinfluencesan

audiencebeyondtheimmediatevictim.Terrorism aswepreviouslysaidis

notanew phenomenon;itisdeeplyembeddedinhistory.Apeepinto

historyrecordsthat,terrorism hasbeenoneofthestarkestexpressionsof

rejectionofauthority.Terrorism eatsawaythesocio-politicalfabricof

manystates,underminesdemocracy,providesarationalforagovernment

todelaydemocraticreformsandcanincreasetensionamongstates.The

resultisoftenimpressionthattheworldisinastateofchaos,and

internationalorderandauthorityarecollapsing(Viotti&Kauppi,2009).

Terrorism hasbeenanoldscourgetohumankindfrom timepast,

andforthepastthreedecades,terroristactivitiesintheworldhave

increasedtoanalarmingrate.Forinstance,sincethe1970s,international

terrorism sponsoredbystatesandnon-stateactors,hasevolvedintoan

insidioustrendthatoftenhurtcivilianpopulations.Oftenusedbythe

relativelypowerless againstthe powerful,terrorists operate basically

17

throughsurprise(Mingst,1999).

From thebombingoftheembassiesoftheUnitedStatesofAmerica

inKenyaandTanzaniain1988,totheSeptember11,2001worldtrade

centrebombingsinNewYork,theMumbaiattacksinIndia,thekillingofthe

AmericanAmbassadorinLibyaandtheBokoHaram attacksinNigeria,the

storyremainsthesame.Terroristattackshavecontinuedtocauselossof

livesandproperty.AccordingtoKegley(2007),terrorismposesanalarming

kindofcontemporaryviolence.

Therearedifferentmechanismsandglobalpoliciescurrentlyinuse

forfighting terrorism.These ranges from peacefuland diplomatic

negotiations,makingsecretconcessions,pacification,theuseofeconomic

sanctionsanduseofmilitaryforceinsomecases.Asaresultofthe

growing sophistication of terrorist networks and the havoc such

clandestinegroupsposetosociety,theuseofmilitaryforceisbecominga

preferredalternativeapproachinthestruggleagainstterrorism.Thisof

coursehascontinuedtoelicitresponsesandcriticismsfrom policyand

legalanalysts.Mostofsuchcriticismsmakereferencetotheprosecution

ofwhatiscurrentlytermedasthe“waronterror”asexemplifiedinIraqand

Afghanistan.TheinvasionofIraq,whichledtothedeathofPresident

18

Saddam Hussein,andthefightagainsttheTalibaninAfghanistanhaveled

tothedeathofmanycombatantsandinnocentcivilians,coupledwiththe

destructionofpropertiesworthbillionsofdollars.

Whereinformationgapexistsorispoorlyhandled,liketheIraq’s

chemicalweapons detection blunder,militaryoperation maylead to

collateraldamagesthatcouldimpingeoninternationallaw.Justfewyears

ago,terrorism seemedtoberestrictedtoafewisolatedplaces,suchas

NorthernIreland,theBasqueCountryinNorthernSpain,andsomeareasof

theMiddleEast.Now -especiallysinceSeptember11,2001,withthe

destructionoftheTwinTowersinNew York-worldwidephenomenon

(June,2006:4).


Recent Project Materials

Abstract Trade fair as an instrument of increasing sales in business organization, a case study of Emily Mil...
Word(doc) 1-5 1 Read More
Abstract The purpose of this study is to assess pricing policies and strategy in the marketing of competitiv...
Word(doc) 1-5 3 Read More
Abstract Branch (1975;12) was of the view that productivity means the continuing improvement of the firm ma...
Word(doc) 1-5 1 Read More
Abstract This research work aptly examines the use of Information Communication Technology (ICT) in Abuja Mu...
Word(doc) 1-5 1 Read More
View More Topics

Browse by Departments