INTRODUCTION
Background of the StudyIn any society, irrespective of its level of development,educational institutions are established primarily to providerecipients of education with the knowledge, skills, attitudes,work habits and competencies required by the people toperform their social, economic and political roles efficiently,effectively and creditably. This has always influenced theformation of each nation’s policy on education. In Nigeria, forinstance, the National Policy on Education (2004) Section 1.5stated the National aims and objectives of NigerianEducation thus:i. The inculcation of national consciousness and nationalunity.ii. The inculcation of the right type of values and attitudefor the survival of the individual and the Nigerian society.iii. The training of the mind in the understanding of theworld around andiv. The acquisition of appropriate skills, abilities andcompetencies both mental and physical as equipment for15the individual to live in and contribute to thedevelopment of his society (FGN 2004:1.5).The attainment of these lofty aims and objectivesdepends largely on the productivity of the people (staff) whoman the system and this in turn is influenced by how wellthese staff are managed to perform their functions and theirlocations whether rural or urban.The complex nature of the educational establishmentmakes it possible for people with different backgrounds interms of needs, goals, skills, talents, status, competencies,knowledge, behaviors, styles, interest, values, prejudices,aggressiveness, perception, temperament, and so on to bemembers of school system (Peretomode 1997). Teachers andpupils which constitute educational input in the schoolsystem come from different backgrounds and have differentneed-dispositions. Their need-dispositions are sometimes atvariance with the goals of the school. Under such state ofdiversity, operation of the school system cannot be devoid ofconflict. This is because individuals or groups are sometimesbound to disagree on issues with emotional intensity (Olele2000, Umoren 1997 & Mescon 1998). Moreover, the naturalrural setting belief that leadership is a masculine position16sometimes stirs up conflict in any school headed by femaleadministrator.Thus, it is evident in school system that conflicts areinevitable in a natural and a normal development of theschool administration. Due to its inevitable nature,Greenberg & Baron (2000), suggested that schooladministrators must learn to manage conflict rather thanattempt to thwart or eliminate it.Conflict as a concept has a plethora of definitionsbecause of different opinions held about it. Szilagyi (2000),defined conflict as a disagreement between two or moreorganizational members concerning the manner to be used toachieve certain goals. Gray & Starke (2001), saw conflict as abehaviour by a person or group that is purposefully designedto block the attainment of goals by another person or group.While Peretomode, (1997), defined conflict as struggle forcontrol of another person’s behaviour, doing or action.Ezegbe, (1997) opined that conflict refers to struggles,contradictions, mutual hostility in inter human relationship.However, conflict is a clear indication that something iswrong with the organization and that sound principles are17not being applied in managing the activities of theorganizations.Types of conflicts include;1. Intrapersonal conflict. This occurs within the person.Examples of such conflicts are conflicts that emergeover the use of equipments in the school, choice of topicfor research projects, choice of spouse, moral questions,low self esteem, poor financial status.2. Interpersonal conflicts are conflicts between two ormore people. It can result when values, beliefs andattitude do not fit together, for example, conflictbetween the principal of a school and the members ofstaff over the criteria for promotion of students at theend of a session.3. Real conflict occurs when goals or behaviours areincompatible because of struggle for power andresources.4. Artificial conflict is a type of conflict whereby anindividual member in an organization believes he cangain respect within the group by lowering the credibilityof another individual of the same group. (Burgon,Heston, & Mc Croskey, 1994).18Conflicts are seen in homes between parents andteenagers, in schools between students and schoolauthorities, in work places between workers and supervisors,in communities over territories, resources control, powersharing to mention just a few. Sources of conflicts includedifferences in personality tracts, differences in background,differences in values, poor communication skills, differencesin perceptions, differing view, points, emotions and attitudes.Ezenwa (1998), indicated that other sources of conflict inschool includes; non involvement of teachers in decisionmaking process, lateness to duty, formation of cliques bystaff, poor discharge of duties and poor academicbackground of school administrators.School conflict can also arise from the structure such asthe size, location of institution – rural or urban, nature ofwork and gender composition.Conflicts manifest in different forms. It can occur in formof insults, name calling, blackmailing, defamation ofcharacter, false accusation, withdrawal of love and supportor services, withdrawal of salaries, strikes, suspension,sudden transfer, demotion, termination of appointments,violent demonstration, wars and killing (Ezegbe, 1997).19Conflicts have led to wars, dislocation of people and loss oflives and property. Greed, egoism and desire to have powerover others are humanity worst enemies. In some way, theyare at the root of every conflict (Pope John Paul II, 2001). Allover the world, conflict has caused misery and suffering tomillions of people. According to UNDP (2002) during the 16years of civil war in Mozambique, more than 40% of theschools and health clinics were destroyed or forced to closedown. The economic loss caused by the war in Mozambiquewas estimated at $ 15 billion.Conflict has its merits and demerits. For anadministrator, conflict handled with wisdom can help himmake effective decisions. This is because the dissentingopinions will expose different aspects of the problem at hand.A judgment made after a careful consideration of theseopinions is likely to be an effective one. However, wheneverpeople gather for any purpose there is bound to bedisagreement. In the school setting not all disagreements areconflicts but all conflicts result from disagreements (Mbipom& Okon 2003). The success of any school organizationtherefore depends on the ability of the school administratorto resolve the conflicts arising from disagreements within the20school system. The administrator’s efforts at achieving theset objectives of the National Policy on Education will behindered if he is unable to manage his teacher and pupilswell so as to reduce conflicts when they arise.According to, (Ezegbe 1997) conflicts in any organization canbe managed effectively using the following methods;1. Dialogue. This is calling the conflicting parties in adisputes to express their grievances and thus freetheir mind of grudges and bitterness.2. Arbitration is a process of bringing in a peacemakerto settle the problem.3. Confrontation is the use of force or debate by the twoopposing parties to solve their problems.4. Separation device as the name implies involvesseparating the two opposing individuals by transfer,to another section of the organization.5. Super ordinate goal is involving the conflictingparties in the interrelated work thereby forcing themto have a better relationship as they work together.6. Prayer is another way to managing conflicts. Theproblems can be taken to God in prayers and He willeffect a lasting solution to any conflict.217. Empathy involves putting oneself into the feeling ofothers. Ability to sense the distress of another persondecreases the tendency to hurt him and would easilyelicit apologies to sooth ill feelings. Thus nipping theconflict in the bud.For teacher-role performance to be effective, schooladministrators should be versed in conflict managementstrategies and apply any of them to solve individual teachersor group conflicts based on the situation it best fits. Inaddition, school administrator should initiate healthycommunication, maintain peace, remain accountable to thepeople he serves, demonstrate forgiveness, train staff andstudents as mediators, encourage reconciliation andmaintain confidentiality.Conflicts are inherent and inevitable in any humanorganization. The existence and prevalence of such conflictsand their traumatic effects on educational institutionsdemand that emerging conflicts should be controlled tomaximize productivity and for the education system toachieve its aims and objectives. This underscores the needsto find the means of resolving conflicts before they get out ofhand.22Statement of the ProblemThere is a growing concern about conflicts in schoolsand the society today. The issue of aggressive behavioursand bullying in primary schools is alarming. There is needthat conflicts be managed constructively in order not toescalate and consequently interfere with the learning processand playground harmony. Teacher actions at a classroomand school level have an important influence on studentconflict management. Over the ages, the government,administrators and religious bodies have been encounteringa lot of conflicts.There is a general impression that conflict in schools ison the increase (Onwurah, 1995). Sometimes people blamethe government, administrators, head teachers for theirinability to control conflict situations in schools. Manyresearchers have written works on the causes andimplications of conflicts in schools. For example, Onwurah(1995) pointed out that schools nowadays are more involvedin conflict than in the past. Little or nothing has been writtenon how conflict is resolved or managed in primary schoolsespecially in Awka Education Zone of Anambra State.23As a school teacher, it was observed that many a times,the pupils have constant quarrel with one another. Thedisagreements which the pupils have at play grounds oftentimes are not settled, and these are carried into theclassroom during lesson, which in turn disturb the teachingand learning processes in the classroom. The teacher whomight not have known that such problems existed will bebusy teaching only to be distracted by noise in theclassroom. This makes the teacher unhappy and theteaching and learning process in the classroom negativelyimpacted.Effective management of conflict in the school settingwould go along way to improve teaching and learning. Thequestion is how are conflicts handled in our primaryschools? Thus, the statement of a problem as a question:What are the conflicts management strategies in use inprimary schools in Anambra State?Purpose of the StudyThe main aim of this study is to determine howconflicts are managed or handled in primary schools by headteachers, teachers and pupils. The study is speciallydesigned to:241. Identify the methods used by head teachers in managingconflicts between teacher and teacher.2. Identify the methods used by teachers in managingconflicts between pupils and pupil.3. Identify the methods used by pupils in managingconflicts among themselves.4. Determine how teachers perceive the conflictmanagement skills of their head teachers.Significance of the StudyThe findings of this study may lead the policy andcurriculum planning experts to include as one of the contentareas: conflict management in the primary schools’ teacherpreparation curriculum.The research findings when published can be used tohelp pupils know effective means of handling conflicts andthus promote their social and interpersonal relationship. Thefindings of this study may also help to enhance theeffectiveness of the head teachers and teachers as conflictmanagers. The research findings may enhance the schooladministrators and guidance counselors’ effectiveness inconflict management.25The findings may add to the wealth of knowledge onhow to carry out conflict management strategies effectively inprimary schools.The Scope of the StudyThe study was delimited to the study of conflictsmanagement strategies in use in primary schools inAnambra State. The variables covered by the study are;conflict management strategies which head teachers used.Conflict management used by teacher. Conflict managementstrategies that pupils used. The influence of the variable,‘gender’ and ‘school location’ (i.e urban-rural factor) werealso examined.Research QuestionsThe following research questions guided the study.1. What are the methods used by head teachers inmanagement conflicts between teachers?2. What are the methods used by teachers in managingconflicts among pupils?3. What are the strategies used by pupils in managingconflicts between themselves?4. What are the teachers views on the conflict managementtechniques of their head teachers?26HypothesesThe under-listed null hypotheses were tested at the0.05 level of significance. These are:1. There is no significant difference in the mean ratingof head teachers in urban and rural schoolsconcerning conflict management strategies they usein managing conflicts between teachers.2. There is no significant difference in the meanrating, of teachers in urban and rural schoolconcerning conflict management strategies they usein managing conflicts among pupils.3. There is no significant difference in the meanratings of male and female pupils concerningconflict management strategies they use inmanaging conflicts amongst themselves.4. There is no significant difference in mean ratings ofteachers in urban and rural schools concerningconflict management techniques of their headteacher.