Home Project-material EVALUATION OF THE MECHANICAL PROPERTIES OF POLYPROPYLENE/CALCIUM CARBONATE NANOCOMPOSITE AT VARIOUS CREEP CONDITIONS

EVALUATION OF THE MECHANICAL PROPERTIES OF POLYPROPYLENE/CALCIUM CARBONATE NANOCOMPOSITE AT VARIOUS CREEP CONDITIONS

Dept: MECHANICAL ENGINEERING File: Word(doc) Chapters: 1-5 Views:

Abstract

The mechanical properties of Polypropylene and Polypropylene/Calcium Carbonate nanocomposites were evaluated. Data on the influence of Calcium Carbonate on the tensile strength, young’s modulus, elongation and creep modulus were obtained for the nanocomposite by conducting a tensile test for the coated and uncoated samples and creep test for the coated samples at different Calcium Carbonate loadings by varying the stresses and temperatures. It was found that the resistance to creep was high for the nanocomposite as compared to the neat Polypropylene. The Young’s modulus of the nanocomposite showed some improvements with the incorporation of the Calcium Carbonate nano-filler while the tensile strength deteriorated. The Creep modulus decreases with increase in temperature and time. Above all, the Polypropylene and Polypropylene/Calcium Carbonate creep responses showed a non-linear response for the properties evaluated revealing viscoelasticity of the polymer matrix m
INTRODUCTION

Nanocomposites refer to materials consisting of at least two phases with one

dispersed in another that is called matrix and forms a three-dimensional network.

It can be defined as a multi-phase solid materials where one of the phases has one,

two or three dimensions of less than 100 nano metres (nm) or structures having

nano-scale repeat distances between the different phases that make up the

material(Manias,2007).

Nanocomposites differ from conventional composite materials mechanically due

to the exceptional high surface to volume ratio of the reinforcing phase and/or its

exceptional high aspect ratio. The reinforcing material can be made up of particles

(e.g. minerals), sheets (e.g. exfoliated clay sticks) or fibres (e.g. carbon nanotubes

or electro spun fibres). The area of the interface between the matrix and the

reinforcement phase(s) is typically an order of magnitude greater than for

conventional composite materials.

Polypropylene is isotactic, notch sensitive and brittle under severe conditions of

deformation, such as low temperatures or high temperatures. This makes limited

its wider range of usage for manufacturing processes. It is a versatile material

widely used for automotive components, home appliances, and industrial

applications. This is attributed to their high impact strength and toughness when

filler is incorporated.

2

To meet demanding engineering and structural specifications, PP is rarely used in

its original state and is often transformed into composites by the inclusion of

fillers or reinforcements.

Introduction of fillers or reinforcements into PP often alters the crystalline

structure and morphology of PP and consequently results in property changes

(Karger-Kosis, 1995).

Polypropylene is an exceedingly versatile polymer, made from a widely available,

low cost feedstock in a relatively straightforward and inexpensive process.

Polypropylene has good mechanical properties, chemical resistance, accepts fillers

and other selected additives very well, and is easy to fabricate by a variety of

methods. In addition, it is quite easy to incorporate small amounts of other

copolymers, such as ethylene, to yield Polypropylene copolymers with different

and commercially desirable properties. Overall, the combination of low cost, ease

of fabrication, ability to tailor the resin with co-monomers, and its acceptance of

high levels of fillers and other additives make Polypropylene a material of choice

in many cost-sensitive application.

However, the levels of fillers and other additives that must be incorporated to

achieve the desired properties are difficult or even impossible to incorporate “inline” either in the polymerization process or in the fabrication step.

3

These fillers generally target specific property improvement, such as stiffness and

elastomeric properties, as shown in figure 1, or to meet service requirements such

as flame retardant specifications.

The common materials compounded into Polypropylene are mineral fillers (e.g.

calcium carbonate, talc or barium sulphate), glass fibre, elastomers such as

polyolefin elastomers or Ethylene-Propylene-Diene Rubber, and high levels of

colourants or other additives.

The incorporation of fillers and additives by compounding serves to extend the

performance envelope of Polypropylene to compete with engineering plastics or

against thermoset or thermoplastic elastomers.

For the purpose of this thesis, a composite is defined as a mixture of

Polypropylene and ingredient(s) in specific proportion to give a defined result or

product. The production of Polypropylene materials containing high levels of

additives, most notably fillers, is considered as compounding.The resultant

composite formed using nano filler is called a nanocomposite.

4

Stiffness/

HDT

Toughness

Glass filled coupled PP

Glass filled PP

Mineral filled PP

Homo PP

Co PP

Figure 1: Polypropylene properties.

source:www.nexant.com/products/csresports/index.asp?

Recently, many nanometer-sized types of filler have been commercially produced

and they represent a new class of alternative fillers for polymers. Among the

promising nano fillers that have stirred much interest among researchers include

organo clay, nano silica, carbon nano tube and nano calcium carbonate.

Studies have shown that the large surface area possessed by these nano fillers

promotes better interfacial interactions with the polymer matrix compared to

conventional micrometer sized particles, leading to better property enhancement

(Goa, 2004).

1.1 Mineral Filled Polypropylene (PP)

There are a number of inorganic mineral fillers used in Polypropylene. The most

common of these fillers are talc, calcium carbonate and barium sulphate; other

mineral fillers used are wollastonite and mica.

5

Mineral fillers are generally much less expensive than Polypropylene resin itself.

Mineral fillers reduce the costs of the compound formed with Polypropylene and

also increase the stiffness. Mineral fillers also provide reinforcement to the

polymer matrix as well. Some mineral fillers are surface treated to improve their

handling and performance characteristics. Sudhin and David (1998) Silanes,

glycols, and stearates are used commercially to improve dispersion, processing,

and also to react with impurities.

For the purpose of this thesis, the mineral filler used is calcium carbonate.

Calcium Carbonate (CaCO3) can be classified as:-

Mineral ground or Natural

Precipitated or Synthetic

Naturally occurring CaCO3 is found as chalk, limestone, marble and is the

preferred variety for filler incorporation into PP.

A typical composition of filler grade CaCO3 is shown below:

CaCO3 : 98.5 – 99.5%

MgCO3 : up to 0.5%

Fe2O3 : up to 0.2%

Source: Material safety data sheet

Other impurities include Silica, Alumina and Aluminum Silicate, depending on

location and source of the ore.

6

Loadings of CaCO3 in PP typically run from 10 to 50%, although concentration as

high as 80% has been produced Karger-Kosis (1995).

CaCO3 is usually selected as filler when a moderate increase in stiffness is desired.

It also increases the density of the PP compound; reduces shrinkage, which can be

helpful in terms of part distortion and the ability to mould in tools designed for

other polymers. At typical levels of 10 to 50%, the CaCO3 does not significantly

affect the viscosity of the compound. The main secondary additive employed in

CaCO3 is a stearate. The stearic acid acts as a processing aid. It helps to disperse

the finer-particle size CaCO3. It also helps to prevent the absorption of stabilizers

into the filler. Finally, as an added benefit, it acts to cushion the system, resulting

in improved impact. The dispersion qualities of CaCO3 particles play a crucial role

in its toughening efficiency.

1.2 Motivation

Nanocomposites have attracted attention in recent years because of improved

mechanical, thermal, rheological, solvent resistant and fire retardant properties

compared to the pure or conventional composite materials. Therefore, much work

has focused on developing PP/CaCO3 nanocomposites with tailored mechanical

and morphological properties.This has received much attention from academia and

industry globally.

Engineers and polymer scientists are working hard to produce lightweight

materials as suitable replacement for metals.

7

1.3 Objectives of the Study

The present work aims to:

? Evaluate the Tensile properties of coated and uncoated calcium carbonate

nano-filler with Polypropylene as the host polymer for different volume

fractions.

? Evaluate creep behavior of the coated nanocomposite, for each volume

fraction of the fillers.

? Examine the effects of the fillers on the mechanical behavior of the

nanocomposite. This examination can be utilized for processability and in

developing optimum morphology to maximize products performance.

? This work is an attempt at nano structure fabrication and to get into the

main stream of composite technology of the 21st century


Recent Project Materials

Abstract migration norms is defined as all policies and laws that govern the movement of people from one cou...
Word(doc) 1-5 46 Read More
Abstract A study on the removal of lead from soil samples in zamfara using modified kaolinite clay was studi...
Word(doc) 1-5 12 Read More
Abstract The study examines the impact of Corona Virus on small and medium scale enterprises in Nigeria. CO...
Word(doc) 1-5 16 Read More
Abstract Weed flora of different management techniques under different cropping systems have been reported b...
Word(doc) 1-5 6 Read More
View More Topics

Browse by Departments