INTRODUCTION
1.1 OVERVIEW OF THE STUDYThe construction industry occupies an important position inthe structure of Nigeria’s economy. This assertion becomesnecessary when one considers the role played by the sub sectorto the growth of other sectors as well as the economy in general.Olaloku (1986) reported that this industry employs about fourpercent (4%) of the country’s labour force and contributed abouttwelve percent (12%) of the country’s Gross Domestic Product(GDP).Despite the noted contributions the industry has maintainedunimpressive track of performance evidenced by numerous failedand abandoned construction projects scattering every nook andcranny of the country. The socio-cultural, economic, and politicalenvironment in which the industry operates has directly orindirectly affected growth.On of the areas of construction operation, which hasattracted little attention, is the management of constructionmaterials. The construction project evaluation with focus on thematerial management processes and procedures has becomenecessary since it will equally subsume other areas ofconstruction cost management. Modern material’s managementtools and techniques as applied to construction projects, analysisixthe elemental cost of projects based on material inputs andpossible cost variations based on price fluctuations but not at theexpense of quality/value maximization. According to Sloan (1990)of a total utility of 100% associated with a construction project,the client places the following importance upon the three criticalfunctional aspects:i Quality – 45%ii Cost – 35%iii Time – 20%On the other hand Onyeador (1997) posits that the successor failure of construction projects could be measured in terms ofcost of completion vs budget, time take to complete the projectvs planned duration and the extent to which the completedproject conforms with the design specifications (quality).However, Onyeador (1992) is of the view that constructionproject undertakings are difficult to mange. This according to himmay be due to the complex nature of activities involved: alwayshaving design systems separated from actual construction, andthe multi-disciplinary nature of the team. Also the competitivetendering often adopted in practice introduces some socioeconomic and political dimensions to the management system.Apart from the client/sponsor, other project participants includethe contractors, consultants, (Architects, Quantity surveyors,Engineers) and other stakeholders (material suppliers,government regulatory agencies and host community).xThese project participants agree to implement the projectaccording to the time, cost and quality specifications, which theclient has directly or indirectly caused to be made in respect ofthe design for the project.Where these initial project specifications otherwise referredto as success. Criteria or parameters are met, the project isdeemed to have been a success, otherwise a verdict of failure isreturned on the project Kerzner (1995).However what may be the single most critical factor to theclient is quality PMBOK (2001). In this era of economicdepression and rapid rising material cost, concerns for optimumutilization of available resources tend to dominate all decisionsrelating to construction project undertakings. It is only withhighly skilled project management team that uncertainties in theplanning and execution processes can be kept to a minimum onorder attain significantly the quality objectives of the constructionproject within optimal time and cost. Infact Mezue (1992) placedcost material input at an average of 655 of the total constructionproject delivery sum.Consequently, construction materials, has become one ofthe most important elements of cost management in theconstruction industry toady. There is therefore particular need forincreased attention in the area of material management to ensurecost effectiveness in construction project management. Thomasand Kramer (1987).xiThis research work therefore, attempts to evaluate thematerials management strategies in the Nigeria constructionindustry as a way of improving the state of project managementpractices as applied in the construction industry in Nigeria.1.2 STATEMENT OF PROBLEMIn recent time, the Nigerian society has faced the challengeof increasing need for construction projects. Despite thatconcerted efforts have been made in response to this by thesystem; the scenario has been that of more disappointment(widespread project failure and abandonment). More often thannot these projects are characterized by cost overruns, shoe paceof project execution and time lags, substandard level ofworkmanship and quality. In extreme cases total abandonmentare experienced. Equally, the planning and management ofconstruction materials usage are often based on the contractors;experience and intuition than on rational analysis of the works tobe performed based on application of known scientific tolls andtechnique. The failure of any construction project through poormaterials management carried two repercussions to theeconomy. These are the waste of resource used in its executionand the denial of the opportunity for other projects that dependon the former from coming on stream. All these put togetherhave made most construction project efforts to seem likepromotion of economic waste and social misdeeds.xii1.3 OBJECTIVES OF STUDYThe objective of this study are as follows:1. To assess the nature and magnitude of relationship existingbetween the level of materials requirement planning as applied inthe Nigeria construction industry and the extent of successrecorded in project implementation.2. To analyze the impact of materials procurement systems onsuccessful materials management in construction projects.3. To analyze the contributions of poor materials handlingtechnique on successful materials management in constructionssites.4. To establish the contribution of poor materials storage methodson unsuccessful materials management in construction sites.5. To evaluate the extent to which material waste has led tounsuccessful project delivery in the Nigerian constructionindustry.1.4 HYPOTHESESThe following hypotheses were tested in the course of this studyand formed the basis for the conclusions and recommendationsmade in the studyH01: There is no significant relationship between material requirementplanning and successful project implementation.H02: There is no significant relationship between procurement andeffective materials management in construction projects.xiiiH03: There is no significant relationship between poor materialhandling technique and successful materials management inconstruction project delivery in Nigeria.H04: There is no significant relationship between inappropriatematerials storage and successful materials management inconstruction projects.H05: Increased material waste has no significant relationship withunsuccessful construction project delivery in Nigeria1.5 SIGNIFICANCE OF STUDYThis work will be of immense importance to alloperators in the construction industry. The performance of theindustry will improve, as efforts will be redirected to effectiveapplication of scientific techniques forconstruction materials management.In addition, it will enable efficient allocation of resources byencouraging the integration of network scheduling techniques intothe conventional material planning and scheduling processes.This, therefore, will improve the planning skill of the participantsin the industry. Also it will expand the reserve of materials forfuture researchers in the areas of project management,construction management as well as other allied fields.xiv1.6 THE NEED FOR THE STUDYThe would over, economic resources have not only remainedlimited but also rather scarce. In the face of this objective, theNigerian construction industry needs to be efficient in resourceutilization in its project management processes in order to meetup the international competitive standard of high quality atoptimum cost. This study has the following as its significance:i. Creating awareness of the problems affecting materialmanagement in the Nigerian construction industry.ii. Minimizing the deviation of project value from the initial estimatethrough optimal utilization of available resource.iii Reducing/eliminating failures and/or abandonment of constructionproject by avoiding cost escalations, time slippages andsubstandard quality. Achievement of optimal total utility willtherefore be enhanced.1.7 SCOPE OF STUDYThe study is limited to the construction projects (building and civilengineering works). It concentrates on the contractors,consultants (Architects, Builders, Quantity Surveyors, Engineers,Project Managers) and clients operations in the industry in PortHarcourt. Attention is particularly paid to only materialsmanagement strategies in the construction industry duringproject execution phase since construction project management isof a broader perspective.